W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2001

Followup on rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 04:20:18 -0400
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010430042018.A12687@w3.org>
My apologies for missing the Apr 27 meeting.  I scanned the IRC
log and I have a question about what the WG decided wrt the
rdf-ns-prefix-confusion issue:

 [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

My input for the this issue was given in:

 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html

and it contains:

   1. The grammar in section 6. of the M&S spec:


    should be changed so that all of the RDF attributes (e.g. about,
    resource, etc.) are qualified with a RDF namespace.

In the meeting log:

 [3] http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2001-04-27.html

it says:
  RESOLVED:  strongly recommend namespace qualified attributes, allow but strongly deprecate unqualified attributes

Does this mean that instead of changing the grammar as recommended 
in 1. in [2], that some text like that which is found in the IRC
log (RESOLVED: strongly ...) will be added to the spec?

Also, wrt process, will the IRC logs serve as the WG's minutes?


Received on Monday, 30 April 2001 04:20:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:00 UTC