Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusioN

On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:22:23AM -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> Re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html
> 
> > [[
> >   All elements and attributes in RDF must be namespace qualified
> > ]]
> 
> What is the reasoning for "all elements" being part of this requirement?
> Many current RDF documents use default namespaces properly to default
> elements. Is there a reason for disqualifying this practice?

Perhaps something like:

 [[
   Unqualified elements and attributes in RDF are discouraged
 ]]

would be better.

Art
---

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 09:31:56 UTC