- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:21:56 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I ask the RDF Core WG consider the proposal for this issue
based on the document written by Brian McBride and myself:
A Proposed Interpretation of RDF Containers
http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/current.htm
where we make several proposals:
1. remove the ambiguity by making the container productions
part of the typedNode (6.13) production
2. make rdf:li legal wherever propName (6.14) can be used
3. describe rules for processing rdf:li into specific enumerated
rdf:_<n> properties
4. give a description of the interaction with rdf:aboutEach
although #4 may need to be deferred dependent on what, if anything is
done with rdf:aboutEach.
The above have no or minimal impact on existing deployed RDF or
parsers, and actually make the grammar more regular for parsing.
Dave
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 06:21:59 UTC