There is no "Raggett:" representation as such since the whole point of the approach I am recommending is that the surface syntax is malleable and that the linked rule base defines how to map this to the display schema and clipboard formats. As a result the examples below are purely subjective: 1) x sub 1 or x_1 2) s sub i sub j or x sub {i sub j} 3) x squared or x sup 2 4) x sub 1 sup 2 My personal bias is towards syntax which matches the way most people would say the expression aloud. Dave RaggettReceived on Wednesday, 14 August 1996 23:02:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 15 April 2023 17:19:57 UTC