Re: SOAP Message Canonicalization - New Version

• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
• Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:36:57 -0500 (EST)
• To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
• cc: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>, "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org" <w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
• Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0301241936040.21671-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

For waht it's worth, I'm fine with either canonicalization or message
normalization.  Of course, if we're going to be picky and therefore reject
c14N, then we should call it "soap message infoset normalization", no?
	/r4

Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 19:36:59 UTC