- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:33:21 -0500
- To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
On Friday 24 January 2003 15:44, Marc Hadley wrote: > I don't intend to imply that it could be used as a > CanonicalizationMethod, perhaps the sentence should be reworded as: > > "It is always used in conjunction with a CanonicalizationMethod (e.g. > XML Canonicalization [XML C14N] or Exclusive XML Canonicalization [EXCL > C14N]) and may also be used in conjunction with other Transform > algorithms1." I think the bit that is confusing me is you are using the 'CanonicalizationMethod' element name, so I read that as it can be used with that element. If you replaced 'CanonicalizationMethod' with 'canonicalization algorithm' that source of confusion goes away! <smile/> > Hmmm, I see your point. I was using canonicalization in its broader > sense. I'd prefer to keep the current name but I could probably live > with something like "SOAP Message Normalization (soap-n11n)" - I think > 'Identity Transform' could be confusing since it would imply that > nothing is changed which is true semantically but not lexically. Message Normalization sounds good to me.
Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 16:33:27 UTC