- From: Carl Ellison <cme@jf.intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:36:30 -0700
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: "XML Signature (W3C/IETF)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 03:16 PM 7/24/2002 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote: >On Wednesday 24 July 2002 01:30 pm, Rich Salz wrote: >> It is sad that there are five C14N algorithms (minimal, c14n c14n >> w/comments, excl, excl w/comments). > >We followed the use cases. The first was signing parts of forms, for >which c14n works well (and we decided to make a comments parameter >since we couldn't rule them in or out all-together). exc-c14n >followed the messaging scenario. I don't think it's accurate to >even say there is a "minimal" c14n as presently there is no >normative specification nor interop report. Instead, all we >recommend is if people have constrained applications what >characters they need to grab in the SignedInfo and their operation >can be profiled/constrained to always read/write c14n syntax. If one writes c14n syntax, does that mean that there are no namespace abbreviations (that they're all expanded to full urn's)? - Carl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPT9IDcxqBGb+WvJAEQIDQgCfaWUwjzFaVgra2S74n8kVMqNzDREAoMGt XyCCvirNzc241ztb864Tq/xb =tMdL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +--------------------------------------------------------+ |Carl Ellison Intel Labs E: cme@jf.intel.com | |2111 NE 25th Ave T: +1-503-264-2900 | |Hillsboro OR 97124 F: +1-503-264-6225 | |PGP Key ID: 0xFE5AF240 C: +1-503-819-6618 | | 1FDB 2770 08D7 8540 E157 AAB4 CC6A 0466 FE5A F240 | +--------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 20:41:32 UTC