- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:53:47 -0400
- To: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
- CC: Carl Ellison <cme@jf.intel.com>, "XML Signature (W3C/IETF)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I wasn't suggesting a complete rewrite, just the one misleading sentence. I wonder if "convert to base64" is a better minimal c14n. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JanMar/0226.html I dont think I'll be doing minimal c14n for a reason you alluded to: by the time I get called, the document has already been parsed. /r$
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 15:53:52 UTC