- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 17:35:36 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
r/reagle@w3.org/2002.06.05/12:32:43
>On Wednesday 05 June 2002 12:23 pm, merlin wrote:
>> Agreed, things are much more clear. §3, 4.3.3,
>
>Try a refresh. I don't see a §3, 4.3.3, and 4.3 is about xmlns="" not
>namespace node prefixes...
Meant to say §3, 3.3:
3. ...
3. it has not yet been rendered by any output ancestor, or the
nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly utilizes
the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set with the a
different namespace prefix and value as N.
>> "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>> utilizes the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set
>> with the a different namespace prefix and value as N."
>>
>> This doesnt't quite capture it. Either:
>> "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>> utilizes the namespace prefix does not have a namespace node in
>> the node-set with the same prefix and value as N."
>> Or:
>> "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>> utilizes the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set
>> with the same prefix and a different value than N, or has no
>> namespace node in the node set with the same prefix as N."
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 12:36:10 UTC