- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:41:42 +0200
- To: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com>
- Cc: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>, John Boyer <jboyer@PureEdge.com>, "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <Donald.Eastlake@Motorola.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
>> Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: >> >> Right. What I suggest is to include ALL namespace nodes (not the ones >> from the DOM model but the ones from the XPath model). Every namespace >> node in an ancestor should effect the current node, not only the >> namespaces nodes whose owner element is in the document subset. >> > > On Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 01:42 -0700 Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com> wrote: > Yes, I agree with this. But I do not like the case > when we have following document > > <foo:Something xmlns:foo="http://example.org/foo"> > <bar:Something xmlns:bar="http://example.org/bar" /> > </foo:Something> > > the XPath expression looks like > > self::bar:Something > > and the canonicalized output looks like > > xmlns:foo="http://example.org/foo" > <bar:Something xmlns:bar="http://example.org/bar" > xmlns:foo="http://example.org/foo" /> From my point of view it should > look have *only* <bar:Somehting /> > > <bar:Something xmlns:bar="http://example.org/bar" /> > > So the suggestion is to include all visibly utilized namespace nodes and > simply do not check namespace nodes for presence in the input nodes set. > > Aleksey. Uuh, it becomes complicated ;-)) I agree on what you say: If we do 'enforce' that all (relevant) changes in namespace-space become visible in the elements where (1) the namespace is utilized or (2) the namespace is in the IncusiveNamespaces.PrefixList and 'changes' it's value, there's no need to output a namespace attribute if the owner element is omitted from the document subset. I would say: If the owner element (parent?) of a namespace node is not in the document subset, the namespace node is not output. Regards, Christian PS: Yesterday, I asked Merlin (not via list) the following: --On Dienstag, 4. Juni 2002 15:52 +0100 merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie> wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > Namespace nodes are not output if their parent element > is not in the node set, unless their prefix is in > IncusiveNamespaces.PrefixList. > > http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xml-exc-c14n.html > Section 3, item 3 > [A namespace node not in IncusiveNamespaces.PrefixList is ignored if] > 1. Its parent element is not in the node set > > Merlin > > r/geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de/2002.06.04/16:19:56 >> Hi Merlin, just a short question about exclusive c14n: >> >> In your (inclusive) c14n samples, you outputted attribute nodes and >> namespaces if they are in the document subset while their owner element >> is not. >> >> Q: Does the same apply for exclusive c14n? For example, the 'A' element >> is not in the subset but it's namespace and attribute axis: ([] denotes >> "in the document subset): >> >> input: >> >> <A [d:a="foo"] [xmlns:a="http://a"] /> >> >> output: >> >> xmlns:a="http://a" d:a="foo" >> >> >> Is this correct? >> >> Regards, >> Christian
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 04:48:56 UTC