- From: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:00:07 -0700
- To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- CC: jboyer@PureEdge.com, reagle@w3.org, Donald.Eastlake@Motorola.com, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Yes, it is. There is a protocol ('foo') and the "path" ('bar'). Aleksey. Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: > Hi All, > > short question about the examples in the "Exclusive XML > Canonicalization" PR: > > > The section "2.2 General Problems with re-Enveloping" contains this babe: > > xmlns:n0="foo:bar" > > My question is: > > Is this a relative namespace? > > xmlns:n0="urn:foo" is not, but the above? > > > Christian
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 12:02:47 UTC