- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 20:34:59 +0200
- To: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
--On Dienstag, 7. Mai 2002 10:37 -0700 John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com> wrote: > The expectation of comment infestation in the XPath element content was > the biggest reason why we defined here() to return the element node > parent when it didn't appear in an attribute. Here's the one that > originally shook my boots, so to speak: > > he<!-- Yikes -->re()/blah/blah/blah > > This is legal XML, so it has to be supported. In general, take the > 'string' corresponding to the Xpath element content, which concatenates > all text nodes descendants. Hi John, OK, that's what I do. Interesting that the above is legal. Maybe we should include such an obfuscation into our interops ;-) Thanks, Christian
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 14:30:57 UTC