Re: Ill-desiged transform sequences

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 04:28, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote:
> I would say that this sequence is ILLEGAL and/or simply does not work
> because c14n trashes the here() context and is therefore not allowed.
> XPath or enveloped-signature requires re-parsing and then here() is
> evaluated against a different document.

I wouldn't think it works for the reasons you guys give, and the spec says, 
"The input and output requirements of this transform are identical to those 
of the XPath transform, but may only be applied to a node-set from its 
*parent* XML document."

Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 12:26:37 UTC