- From: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:23:46 -0700
- To: <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi Aleksey, The format is not proprietary. It is XML. The only question you have to answer is whether you can read the blob of XML and filter it with expressions like the XPaths I gave as examples. If so, how fast is your filter operation. You do not have to create or affix an XML dsig signature. You only need to filter the XML and see whether the results of your filtration match the results of our software (which is, operationally at least, the easiest way to determine whether we're getting a good representative of an XPath expression). Thanks, John Boyer -----Original Message----- From: Aleksey Sanin [mailto:aleksey@aleksey.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:48 AM To: reagle@w3.org Cc: John Boyer; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subject: Re: A simple test of XPath filter performance It's quite difficult to generate signature from this template because it has proprietary format. Since sign/verify operations are almost fully symmetric I suggest to ask John to generate signed XML document and compare performance on signature verification operation. Aleksey. Joseph Reagle wrote: On Monday 22 April 2002 20:13, John Boyer wrote: Joseph asked me to send to the list an example to illustrate the type of performance needed from the XPath filter. Thanks John! Would someone be willing to generate the signature over this that John specified and shared it with the list, then implementors can get a sense of how well the filter2 transform satisfies our requirement for decent performance?
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 16:24:33 UTC