- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:44:51 -0400
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
At 09:08 5/15/2001 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >Great! Unless some opposition crops up soon, there is clearly a >consensus to make this change. I've updated the editor's copy and schema, and tweaked the natural language, my only question is should the following text be tweaked as well: http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-X509Data >Note, there is no direct provision for a PKCS#7 encoded "bag" of >certificates or CRLs. However, a set of certificates or a CRL can occur >within an X509Data element and multiple X509Data elements can occur in a >KeyInfo. __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 14:50:36 UTC