Re: AW: X509CRL discord

Great! Unless some opposition crops up soon, there is clearly a
consensus to make this change.

Thanks,
Donald

From:  "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
To:  "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>,
            "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc:  <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
Date:  Tue, 15 May 2001 10:54:29 +0200
Message-ID:  <LBEPJAONIMDADHFHAEAOMEKKCFAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
In-reply-to:  <200105141821.OAA0000005320@torque.pothole.com>

>Hi all,
>
>> ><complexType name="X509DataType">
>> >  <sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
>> >    <choice>
>> >      <element name="X509IssuerSerial" type="ds:X509IssuerSerialType"/>
>> >      <element name="X509SKI" type="base64Binary"/>
>> >      <element name="X509SubjectName" type="string"/>
>> >      <element name="X509Certificate" type="base64Binary"/>
>> >      <element name="X509CRL" type="base64Binary"/> </choice>
>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^
>                                                       |
>                                                       To be removed!
>
>> >      <any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
>> >    </choice>
>> >  </sequence>
>> ></complexType>
>
>I agree with Don and Merlin to adapt X509Data as Merlin suggested.
>
>Liebe Gruesse/Regards, 
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>DI Gregor Karlinger
>mailto:gregor.karlinger@iaik.at
>http://www.iaik.at
>Phone +43 316 873 5541
>Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
>Austria
>---------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 09:08:51 UTC