W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: AW: Schema definition for <Transform>

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:13:37 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010411100714.020507d0@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>, "Ed Simon" <ed.simon@entrust.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
At 10:26 4/10/2001 +0100, merlin wrote:
>I'm with Gregor. I think that the text should be something along
>the lines of:
>
>The normative specification for XSL Transformations is [XSLT].
>The XSL transformation is encoded within a namespace-qualified
><code>stylesheet</code> element which MUST be the sole transform
>parameter child element.

That was old text that was still using the string context, I've changed it 
using the text above:
        http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-XSLT

>Next paragraph, typo "covert" -> "convert".

ok.

>Next paragraph, typo "to perform canonicalize" -> "to c10e".

ok.


__
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 10:14:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:10:04 UTC