- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:22:37 -0500
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Ok, now reflected in:
http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html
At 21:34 12/9/2000 +0000, merlin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It is probably valid to fill in Y1 down the table for Baltimore.
>
>We are somewhat processor agnostic, however the conformance tests
>that we provide do verify all listed requirements of the processor
>in use.
>
>Merlin
>
>r/reagle@w3.org/2000.12.08/15:14:00
> >
> >The Call for Implementaion Period for Canonical XML closed on November
> 24th.
> >An InformationalRFC as well as a new Candidate Rec (for consideration for
> >Proposed Rec) is being prepared. Changes made include those resulting from
> >comments [1,2,3], no change was made with respect to [4].
> >
> >However, in order to successfully advance it to Proposed Rec, it'd be good
> >in we could fill in some of the gaps in the interop-report [5]. (Petteri
> and
> >Merlin, can you report on the list the status of your implementations with
> >respect to these questions about the parsers treatment of encoding and
> >relative URIs?)
> >
> >[1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0094.html
> >[2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0196.html
> >[3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0208.html
> >[4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0163.html
> >[5] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html
> >
> >__
> >Joseph Reagle Jr.
> >W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
> >IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
> >
__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 13:23:02 UTC