RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema

At 10:04 12/11/2000 +0100, Karl Scheibelhofer wrote:
> > 2. 'FIXME, as is, minOccurs/maxOccurs of "choice" or "any" can be
> > omitted'.
> > Are you saying it's redundant? I'm not sure: what I think we were
> > saying is
> > you can have 0 or more elements (any 0:unbounded) from 0 or more
> > namespaces
> > (choice 0:unbounded). I agree with you if we want to say every
> > SignatureProperty content should only have elements from a single
> > namespace
> > -- which makes sense since people can use multiple SignatureProperties.
>
>yes, you are right. i simply missed the namespace issue.

Actually, my point here is that others might have though that (for instance) 
a signature semantic and a time stamp (both from different namespaces) 
actually did sit in their own SignatureProperty. How do others feel?


__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 13:14:20 UTC