- From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:51:32 -0800
- To: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Four comments: 1. I would feel happier if KeyInfo be defined in a separate spec because: a. KeyInfo can be used in other specs b. KeyInfo can be changed without affecting the signature spec XSL was split into XPath, XSLT, and XSL-FO with good results and I hope to see similar action taken with XML-DSIG. 2. XML-C14N spec's readability is rather lacking. James Clark's original version was better in terms of readability. 3. XML-Schema definition for KeyValue is actually definition for RetrievalMethod. This sort of silly mistakens should have been removed by Candidate Recommendation. 4. Interoperability test data package was unexpandable. Overall, I am happy with what has been done so far. Best, Don Park Docuverse
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 19:44:09 UTC