- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 08:29:35 -0400
- To: Yoshiaki KAWATSURA <kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>
- cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
I don't think there is any significant use of other than v3 these days. Donald From: Yoshiaki KAWATSURA <kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp> To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Cc: kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001002171759.02e06040@rpcp.mit.edu> References: <200009280812.RAA10090@ns.trl.ibm.com> <200009290127.KAA26690@ns.trl.ibm.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20001002171759.02e06040@rpcp.mit.edu> Message-Id: <20001003183030K.kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:30:30 +0900 (JST) >I have a very minor comment in the spec. >### >4.4.4 The X509Data Element > > 5. The X509CRL element, which contains a Base64-encoded X.509v2 > ^^^^^^^ > certificate revocation list (CRL). >### > >X.509v3 is better though we can also contain a Base64-encoded X.509v2 >CRL in the X509CRL... > >---- >Yoshiaki Kawatsura : E-mail kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp > Business Solution Systems Division, Hitachi,Ltd. >Voice: +81-44-549-1713(direct) Fax: +81-44-549-1721 >
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2000 08:26:13 UTC