RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.

Hi Yoshiaki!

> (2-1) For X509Data
> I think the X509IssuerName in the example of X509Data should be
> described actual value such that distinguished name, for example
> <X509IssuerName>CN =XXX Cert, C= US, O = XXX Trust Inc.</X509IssuerName>.
> # Is there any general guideline which describes about text representation
> # of distinguished name? I found <draft-ietf-pkix-generalname-00.txt>
> # which specifies text representations for distinguished names
> # but this document has already expired.

A previous version of the XML-Signature draft mentioned RFC 2253 as the way
to represent a Name as a text string, I think this is still intended by
the authors

(Joseph, Brian: Am I right here?)

Regards, Gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gregor Karlinger
mailto://gregor.karlinger@iaik.at
http://www.iaik.at
Phone +43 316 873 5541
Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 26 June 2000 02:53:06 UTC