- From: John Boyer <jboyer@PureEdge.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:11:59 -0700
- To: "Kevin Regan" <kevinr@valicert.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi Kevin, Actually the confusion came from the fact that you sent the letter directly to me as well as dsig, rather than to John Cowan and the dsig group. Sincerely, *************************************** John Boyer, Software Development Manager PureEdge Solutions (formerly UWI.Com) Creating Binding E-Commerce v:250-479-8334, ext. 143 f:250-479-3772 1-888-517-2675 http://www.PureEdge.com *************************************** -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Regan [mailto:kevinr@valicert.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 3:03 PM To: John Boyer; Kevin Regan; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subject: RE: No Character Normalization? Sorry, I should have said "Mr. Cowan" rather than John in my response. Didn't mean to confuse anyone... :-) --Kevin -----Original Message----- From: John Boyer [mailto:jboyer@PureEdge.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 3:04 PM To: Kevin Regan; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subject: RE: No Character Normalization? Hi Kevin, I appreciated your email, however, I did not get it (due to a meeting) until after it was already answered. Full credit for the informative and authoritative answer belongs to John Cowan. Sincerely, *************************************** John Boyer, Software Development Manager PureEdge Solutions (formerly UWI.Com) Creating Binding E-Commerce v:250-479-8334, ext. 143 f:250-479-3772 1-888-517-2675 http://www.PureEdge.com *************************************** -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Regan [mailto:kevinr@valicert.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 2:58 PM To: jboyer@PureEdge.com; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subject: RE: No Character Normalization? John, Thanks for the information. My greatest concern is to not have to tell my customer that "No, I can't sign that. How did you create that document anyway?" If it is the usual case that documents are created in the normalized form, then it does not seem like a big issue. What would happen in the case of an editor or application written in Java (Unicode)? It seems that this is the most important case given the close coupling of Java and XML. Another concern is whether a document can become "de-normalized" during transmission. My previous question was not specific enough. I understand that documents can be converted to other character formats. However, I'm wondering if a document can leave one application in a normalized form, go through various character encodings, and enter another application with the characters no longer normalized (e.g. A Java application to Java application might go from Unicode, to UTF-8 for transmission, and then back to Unicode in the other application). Finally, you mention that the detection of a non-normalized document would aid in the discovery of forgery. My question is: should similar documents with different character models be equivalent? What would most people expect? I don't really understand the usage enough to have an opinion on this... --Kevin
Received on Friday, 23 June 2000 18:12:01 UTC