- From: <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:17:22 -0400
- To: "Barb Fox" <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, reagle@w3.org
To avoid foreclosing subsequent versions of the standard from covering general electronic signatures, I propose that the third sentence of Barbara's text be changed to the following: "However, the present version of this specification REQUIRES cryptographic SignatureMethods for SignatureValue generation and verification, and these methods shall require at least one cryptographic key for verification." The last clause rules out pure digest algorithms, without which the requirement has little effect. Tom Gindin "Barb Fox" <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com> on 06/12/2000 04:37:36 PM To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org cc: reagle@w3.org Subject: Section 6.1 To close on the issue of electronic signatures, I propose that the following text be included as paragraph two in Section 6.1, Algorithm Identifiers and Implementation Requirements: "This specification defines a set of algorithms, their URIs, and requirements for implementation. In general, requirements apply to implementations, not to signature use. However, this specification REQUIRES cryptographic SignatureMethods for SignatureValue generation and verification. Other authenticators (electronic, biometric, etc.) may be included ONLY as a supplement to the cryptographic signature via the SignatureProperty element type." This should remove any ambiguity. --Barb
Received on Monday, 12 June 2000 20:18:05 UTC