RE: Editors' Post Last Call Draft

Hi Gregor,

At 10:04 00/04/14 +0200, Gregor Karlinger wrote:
 >  In [1] I found out that you have not found one of my reported typos.
 >  Actually the parenthesis can be found in section 2.1.1 (and not in
 >  2.2.1, as I stated before):
 
That's why I couldn't find it! <smile> Fixed.

 >I just have glanced at both the schema definitions and the new schema
 >drafts. Unfortunately the schema drafts have undergone lots of changes
 >(apart from the change to simpletype/complextype), e. g.
 >
 >  * the '*' value in maxOccurs is now called 'unbounded'
 >
 >  * the former group attribute "order" with values like "sequence",
"choice"
 >    has been rejected. These semantics now can be exressed by subelements
 >    named "sequence", "choice".
 >
 >  * the former simple type "uri" is now called "uriReference"
 >To put it in a nutshell, I think we must (once again) redesign our schema
 >definitions so that they conform with XML Schema again.

Right you are. Odd. Perhaps I can explain it in that I've been using Henry
Thompson's validator and maybe it's still permitting bits of the older
syntax. However, he's presently rewriting it for public release, so I'll
speak to him about the above.


_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 12:48:03 UTC