- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:37:23 -0400
- To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Cc: IETF-W3C XML-Signature-WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Christian, Thanks for your comments. [1] We've been working on the post last call draft and have most of the typos handled. The one issue that remains open for discussion is the SignatureProperty(ies) namespace. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JanMar/0160.html At 10:11 PM 3/2/00 +0100, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: >----------------------- > >In section 2.2, explanation of example [p04] > > Is: "In particular, [...] Object, SignatureProperties, or > Should be: "In particular, [...] Object, SignatureProperty, or > >(See end of section 4.3.3, example values for "Type" attribute) > >Related to this definition, another problem occurs. The 3rd "Type" >example in 4.3.3 refers to >"Type="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/xmldsig#SignatureProperty"", >although the referred ID is a Properties element within an Object >and not a Property within a Properties element. > >Suggestion: > It would be clearer to substitute all occurences of > http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#SignatureProperty > by > http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#SignatureProperties > and let the above sentence in its current version. > >----------------------- _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 17:37:44 UTC