RE: comments on 990806 Requirements Doc from Richard D. Brown on 1999-08-18 (w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from July to September 1999)

From: Richard D. Brown <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:01:11 -0500
To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01b701bee99b$46d501c0$0bc0010a@artemis.globeset.com>

Joseph,

Comment Follows...

>  >Why not simply "An XML-signature must be a well-formed XML element"
>
> There is no definition of "well-formed XML element."
>

Fair. In that case, consider "An XML-signature must be an XML element as
specified by the production labeled element in the XML specification."

Richard D.

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 13:01:41 UTC