- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:07:37 -0400
- To: <rdbrown@Globeset.com>
- Cc: <dee3@us.ibm.com>, "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "'John Boyer'" <jboyer@uwi.com>
At 09:10 99/08/18 -0500, Richard D. Brown wrote: >> Done. Richard if you object, say so. >Agreed to some extent. Negotiation tends to imply some form of handshake >(multiple exchanges) during establishement of the key. However, I think that >"agreement" or "exchange" would be more accurate. The method that is used to >establish the key is not necessarily based upon mathematics. I now use agreement. >Why not simply "An XML-signature must be a well-formed XML element" There is no definition of "well-formed XML element." _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 12:07:44 UTC