- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@pincette.biz>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:03:11 +0100
- To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 14:03:52 UTC
Hi Ken, Your conclusion is correct, because the draft uses the REPORT method, which is specified in RFC 3253. However, the draft doesn't refer to this RFC. This would probably be difficult, because synchronization is supposed to work as well for servers and clients that don't implement RFC 3253. Some day the generic stuff in RFC 3253 should move to a separate RFC or perhaps RFC 4918. Best regards, Werner. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: > Folks, > > What is the proper response code for a sync-collection report if the > sync-token is either invalid or out of date? The I-D doesn't seem to > specify, so looking at RFC 3253 section 1.6 it appears that 403 and 409 are > the two options for a precondition failure, with 409 presumably being the > correct choice in this case. Am I missing something? > > Thanks, > Ken > > -- > Kenneth Murchison > Principal Systems Software Engineer > Carnegie Mellon University > > -- http://www.pincette.biz/ Handling your documents with care, wherever you are.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 14:03:52 UTC