- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:17:35 +0100
- To: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
- CC: Atom-syntax Syntax' <atom-syntax@imc.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, Al Brown <albertcbrown@us.ibm.com>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Jan Algermissen wrote: >> Julian, >> >> what is your opinion regarding the introduction of a link relation >> that is the opposite of working-copy in order to being able to find >> the versioned resource that the working copy I have is a working copy of? >> >> I am undecided regarding the necessity, but without a working-copy-of >> relation it seems the client would need to maintain that information >> (the relationship or the fact that a given resource is a working copy) >> across requests. >> >> I do not think this is really I-D publication relevant right now, >> please understand it only as a side comment. >> ... > > I have no problems adding this; the reason it hasn't been proposed was > that apparently CMIS didn't have a use case for it. > > Al, any opinion on this from a CMIS point of view? > ... OK, I have added working-copy-of, and plan to submit the current draft (also including the other changes we discussed) as draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-04 later today. A marked up version with diffs is available at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-latest.html>, feedback appreciated. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 14:18:21 UTC