- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:58:56 +0100
- To: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
- CC: Atom-syntax Syntax' <atom-syntax@imc.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, Al Brown <albertcbrown@us.ibm.com>
Jan Algermissen wrote: > Julian, > > what is your opinion regarding the introduction of a link relation that > is the opposite of working-copy in order to being able to find the > versioned resource that the working copy I have is a working copy of? > > I am undecided regarding the necessity, but without a working-copy-of > relation it seems the client would need to maintain that information > (the relationship or the fact that a given resource is a working copy) > across requests. > > I do not think this is really I-D publication relevant right now, please > understand it only as a side comment. > ... I have no problems adding this; the reason it hasn't been proposed was that apparently CMIS didn't have a use case for it. Al, any opinion on this from a CMIS point of view? Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 16:59:43 UTC