- From: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 23:02:29 +0200
- To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On 25.05.2008, at 22:08, Werner Baumann wrote:
> Fooling older clients, by using protocol elements in a way, that
> clearly contradicts the specification (and that's what we are
> talking about)
Thats what _you_ are talking about ("clearly contradicts the
specification"?!). So far I have seen no one who supports your
arguments.
(though please, there is no need to reiterate your claims, I think
everyone understood what your position is)
BTW: I do not even agree that it is invalid to return 501 in response
to MKCOL. For me a requirement to support MKCOL just means that the
server knows what implementing MKCOL implies according to WebDAV, that
it expects to receive a MKCOL request and can then respond with any
valid HTTP code (given that WebDAV is a strict HTTP superset).
But that is just how I read the combination of the specs.
Thanks,
Helge
Received on Sunday, 25 May 2008 21:03:10 UTC