Re: [Ietf-carddav] Comments on draft-daboo-carddav-02

   This would have been useful in CalDAV; rather than having the  
client hope that the name it chooses isn't already in use.

	-wsv


On Jul 16, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> PS: I'm still not convinced that ADDMEMBER (with precise semantics  
> as opposed to POST) isn't needed in HTTP -- see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-addmember-00.html 
> >.

—
Wilfredo Sánchez - wsanchez@wsanchez.net

Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 18:53:12 UTC