[Bug 229] GULP / Lock timeout discussion

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229





------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2006-02-11 01:08 -------
Well, we discussed this very issue yesterday, and Jim explained that the RFC2518
language was there on purpose (allowing servers wide freedom in how they cleanup
locks).

-1 on any change with this at this point of time, in particular as I don't see
any interop problems.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 09:08:55 UTC