- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:04:53 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213
julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|-11 |-12
------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de 2006-02-11 01:04 -------
I still don't grasp why we want to require sendind the Depth header, if the
semantics for the case where it's missing is 100% clear, and we still have a
should-level requirement to accept requests without it.
If we want to make sure that clients don't *forget* the Depth header if they
really want Depth 0, let's just warn them instead of throwing in yet another
useless MUST.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 09:05:01 UTC