- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:27:21 +0100
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
> http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com 2006-01-31 12:25 -------
> I vote for option 2, since the phrase "the state of the collection includes the
> last path segments of its internal member URLs and the resources they map to"
> is hard to understand, whereas if you give it a term ("binding"), you can just
> say "the state of the collection includes its bindings".
Oh well. I meant to write: "...the state of the collection includes the
relations between the last path segments of its internal member URLs and
the resources they map to..."
Not that this is more readable, but at least it may be correct :-)
Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:29:55 UTC