[Bug 227] Collection state definition in conflict between BIND and RFC2518bis

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227





------- Additional Comments From geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com  2006-01-31 12:25 -------
I vote for option 2, since the phrase "the state of the collection includes the 
last path segments of its internal member URLs and the resources they map to" 
is hard to understand, whereas if you give it a term ("binding"), you can just 
say "the state of the collection includes its bindings".




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:26:02 UTC