- From: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 00:22:38 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
+1 Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi, > > the proposed patches below fixes several problems with PROPFIND, some of > which were recorded in BugZilla issue 213 > (<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213>): > > > Section 9.1., para. 2: > OLD: > > A client MUST submit a Depth header with a value of "0", "1", or > "infinity" with a PROPFIND request. Servers MUST support "0" and "1" > depth requests on WebDAV-compliant resources and SHOULD support > "infinity" requests. In practice, support for depth infinity > requests MAY be disabled, due to the performance and security > concerns associated with this behavior. Since clients weren't > required to include the Depth header in [RFC2518], servers SHOULD > treat such a request as if a "Depth: infinity" header was included. > > NEW: > > A client may submit a Depth header with a value of "0", "1", or > "infinity" with a PROPFIND request. Servers MUST support "0" and "1" > depth requests on WebDAV-compliant resources and SHOULD support > "infinity" requests. In practice, support for depth infinity > requests MAY be disabled, due to the performance and security > concerns associated with this behavior. By default, the PROPFIND > method without a Depth header MUST act as if a "Depth: infinity" > header was included. > > Discussion: requiring clients to send the Depth header (MUST), but also > requiring servers to handle missing headers (SHOULD) does not make > sense. If servers can not rely on the presence of the request header for > backwards compatibility anyway, introducing a MUST level requirement to > send just doesn't make any sense. > > Proposal to revert to original language (note that otherwise this Change > would need to be added to the Changes section). > > > Section 9.1., para. 4: > OLD: > > o Request particular property values, by naming the properties > desired within the 'prop' element (the ordering of properties in > here MAY be ignored by server), > > NEW: > > o Request particular property values, by naming the properties > desired within the 'prop' element, > > Nothing in the spec indicates that ordering is relevant here, so > mentioning it here IMHO is confusing. > > > > Section 9.1., para. 10: > OLD: > > If there is an error retrieving a property then a proper error result > MUST be included in the response. A request to retrieve the value of > a property which does not exist is an error and MUST be noted, if the > response uses a 'multistatus' XML element, with a 'response' XML > element which contains a 404 (Not Found) status value. > > NEW: > > If there is an error retrieving a property then a proper error result > MUST be included in the response. A request to retrieve the value of > a property which does not exist is an error and MUST be noted, with a > 'response' XML element which contains a 404 (Not Found) status value. > > I think this is confusing, because it's always a Multistatus, right? > > > Section 9.1.1., para. 2: > OLD: > > 403 Forbidden - A server MAY reject PROPFIND requests on collections > with depth header of "Infinity", in which case it SHOULD use this > error with the precondition code 'propfind-finite-depth' inside the > error body. > > NEW: > > 403 Forbidden - A server MAY reject PROPFIND requests with depth > header of "Infinity", in which case it SHOULD use this error with the > precondition code 'propfind-finite-depth' inside the error body. > > s/on collections//. The request may be rejected on any type of resource. > > > Section 9.1.2., para. 2: > OLD: > > 200 OK - A property exists and/or its value is successfully > returned. > > 401 Unauthorized - The property cannot be viewed without > appropriate authorization. > > 403 Forbidden - The property cannot be viewed regardless of > authentication. > > 404 Not Found - The property does not exist. > > NEW: > > 200 OK - A property exists and/or its value is successfully returned. > > 401 Unauthorized - The property cannot be viewed without appropriate > authorization. > > 403 Forbidden - The property cannot be viewed regardless of > authentication. > > 404 Not Found - The property does not exist. > > (Indentation inconsistent with other sections) > > > Section 16., para. 31: > OLD: > > Purpose: (precondition) -- This server does not allow infinite-depth > PROPFIND requests on collections. > > NEW: > > Purpose: (precondition) -- This server does not allow infinite-depth > PROPFIND requests. > > > Again, strike "on collections". > > > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 22:22:37 UTC