Re: RFC2518bis (process) from Geoffrey M Clemm on 2005-09-25 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from July to September 2005)

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 08:07:34 -0400
To: " webdav" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFBA21A7E6.474DB1D9-ON85257087.00427CCB-85257087.00429D99@us.ibm.com>

I agree with Julian on this.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 09/25/2005 04:04:46 AM:
 
> As far as I am concerned, the importance of a revised version of RFC2518 

> is much higher than actually moving to Draft Standard, thus if we these 
> two goals conflict (time, interop experience with changes introduced 
> since RFC2518) we should IMHO sacrifice the latter one.

Received on Sunday, 25 September 2005 12:07:43 UTC