W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: RFC2518bis (process)

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:59:20 -0700
Message-Id: <794fae3ecd38f61600684db50aba4fb9@osafoundation.org>
Cc: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

Sure, no problem.

  - I last published RFC2518bis a couple months ago:  
command=id_detail&id=8360.  I don't recall seeing any comments.

  - I don't think Jason Crawford has the time to contribute any more :(   
So no more RFC2518bis co-author or issue tracking.

  - I've been hunting around for interoperability documentation --  
because we did do two interop tests -- but we don't seem to have that  
available now (perhaps it was not intended to be public outside the  
interops anyway).  We never did get somebody to volunteer to collect  
interop data or format that for the IESG  

What are other peoples' thoughts about how to do this now?


On Sep 23, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Elias Sinderson wrote:
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> [...] So can we please consider the union of  
>>> <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm> and  
>>> <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=WebDAV- 
>>> RFC2518-bis> as current issues list?
>> I would think this to be a reasonable starting point for the upcoming  
>> efforts.
>> Re: Bugzilla, are we intending to continue tracking issues on the  
>> bugzilla installation? I would be in favor of this for a number of  
>> reasons that I'll skip over here. (I'll happily enumerate them if  
>> asked, but one should think they them to be rather self-evident and  
>> well understood.) Assuming all are in favor of this approach, someone  
>> will need to take on the task of importing the issues listed on the  
>> webdav.org site into bugzilla. . .
>> For historical and other reasons it would be desireable to import all  
>> of the issues listed, although a certain amount of pragmatism would  
>> dictate that closed issues could be safely omitted. At the very  
>> least, an email should be sent to the mailing list with a summary of  
>> the already closed issues as detailed within the webdav.org list.
>> Following the import into bugzilla, it would seem straightforward to  
>> go through them one-by-one in seperate threads.
> Lisa, Cullen,
> it would be nice if you could provide some feedback about what's going  
> on. Are there any plans to actually get the work finished, should we  
> the working group give up, or are new volunteers for authoring the  
> spec needed?
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2005 21:22:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:34 UTC