- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:56:29 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, jfeise@ics.uci.edu, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Julian Reschke wrote: > > Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> >> Thanks to both you and Jim; that's what I needed. >> >> BTW, if 2518 is undergoing revision, the HTTP header registrations >> should be updated (or made; I think I see a new one in there?); see >> RFC3864/BCP90. > > > As a matter of fact, this also applies to BIND and REDIRECT. Cullen, > should I do that for BIND right away (I don't think we'll need another > WGLC for that...). Speaking of BIND: this draft only contains an update for the "DAV" header (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-12.html#dav.request.header>). Furthermore, RFC2518bis is expected to duplicate this extension. Thus it seems to me that we don't need to add any templates here. The situation for REDIRECT is different; it introduces two new headers; thus I'll update the draft accordingly. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 10:56:41 UTC