Re: RFC2518bis, was: BIND and live property value consistency

Agreed.  I don't know for sure of any implementations myself.  Anybody?

Lisa

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:02:42 -0700, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>>  At this point it would be good to be clear about what we're doing.  I   
>> propose we try for Draft Standard and follow the rules that implies.   
>> Do  you think there's some reason we won't be able to do that?
>
> Yes. There are some things in the draft that are new; so if we want to  
> keep them, we better make sure they are implemented somewhere very soon  
> (I'm thinking of PROPFIND/dead-props, the DAV:lockroot element or the  
> Force-Authenticate header).
>
> Best regards, Julian



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Received on Monday, 11 July 2005 18:28:20 UTC