- From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:07:48 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Sep 3, 2004, at 12:20 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Brian Korver wrote: > >> There seems to be a misunderstanding (due to underspecification?). >> The value of DAV:quota-assigned-bytes is intended to be deterministic. >> I guess that needs to be spelled out explicitly in the spec. > > So what's the relation between DAV:quota-assigned-bytes and > DAV:quota-used-bytes? Quite possibly none. > >> Since the only two implementations of the quota property >> that I know of don't make this distinction, I think it's >> difficult to argue for adding this requirement. > > How are they supposed to make that distinction when they currently > can't? > > Anyway: if you want to write down what two specific implementations > do, then produce a non-WG track document, and try to publish through > the IETF (or elsewhere). If this is supposed to be a WG activity, > you'll also have to listen to those that do not currently implement > it, but might want to do so in the future. > > If there's a split between things we have consensus on and extensions, > and the former part is useful on it's own, put *that* in the standard > tracks document and put the rest into an extension. > > Best regards, Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 > -brian briank@xythos.com
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 17:08:21 UTC