Re: new proposed text for locking overview

Jason Crawford wrote:
> ...
> I don't like us calling a lock a resource.
> ...
> The other paragraphs you included seem reasonable.

I expected pushback on that wording; but I think it really makes things 
clearer. Anything that has a URI *is* a resource (as per RFC2396 
definition). Saying that it is a resource with internal state makes 
talking about it a lot simpler.

So can you explain *why* you don't like that terminology?

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2004 15:38:10 UTC