- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:37:27 +0100
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Cc: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
+1 for removing it. Am 23.03.2004 um 20:40 schrieb Lisa Dusseault: > > Sorry, I meant to put a time limit on feedback -- we'll try to come to > a conclusion in 2 weeks so please hold discussion in that time. > thanks! > > Lisa > > On Mar 23, 2004, at 11:38 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > >> >> I'd like to find out if there is consensus on removing the "property >> registry" task from the WebDAV WG charter. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/webdav-charter.html >> >> We've attempted to discuss this at various WG meetings, and we've >> never made any clear progress in defining the task -- so we don't >> even know whether this would be an Internet-Draft that could become >> an RFC, possibly defining an IANA process, or whether this would be a >> site or non-IANA process of some kind. We also have never had a >> volunteer so we've never had anybody working on this item. Perhaps >> nobody's ever found it to be really necessary. >> >> Note that even if it's removed from the charter, progress can still >> be made if somebody finds the motivation. For example, a property >> registry site could be developed with feedback from the Working >> Group, even if it's not a WG deliverable. >> >> If we don't remove it from the charter, then we need volunteers ASAP >> to work on that item, and clear ideas what the WG deliverable really >> is. Please weigh in. >> >> Lisa >> >
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 03:39:42 UTC