- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:43:02 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > Because the sentence talked only about one collection supporting REBIND, > and I would think that the most important collection to support REBIND > in this case would be the source collection. I think that was a > reasonable and careful read of the text. Well, no: "If the destination collection of a MOVE request supports the REBIND method (see Section 6), a MOVE of a resource into that collection MAY be implemented as a REBIND request." The text clearly talks about the destination collection, and as far as I can tell, it's doing that on purpose. > Perhaps my assumption would not have held up if the sentence had said > "if the destination collection and the source resource of a MOVE request > both support the REBIND method ..." etc. The source resource doesn't need to support REBIND - REBIND is a method where the Request-URI is the target collection into which the new binding is added. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 16:43:40 UTC