- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:09:58 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Because the sentence talked only about one collection supporting REBIND, and I would think that the most important collection to support REBIND in this case would be the source collection. I think that was a reasonable and careful read of the text. Perhaps my assumption would not have held up if the sentence had said "if the destination collection and the source resource of a MOVE request both support the REBIND method ..." etc. Lisa On Jun 23, 2004, at 12:57 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault wrote: > >> This has a little problem with terminology: >>> If the destination collection of a MOVE request supports the >>> REBIND >>> method (see Section 6), a MOVE of a resource into that collection >>> MAY >>> be implemented as a REBIND request. >> The "destination collection" seems here to refer to the collection >> named in the Request-URI, not the collection named in the Destination >> header. > > Can't follow. When talking about a MOVE request, why would you ever > understand "destination collection" as the thing identified by the > Reuqest-URI (which is clearly the source), not the thing identified by > the "Destination" header? > > Please explain. > >> ... > > Best regards, Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 16:10:45 UTC