- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:37:11 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Joe Hildebrand <joe@cursive.net>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
At 8:31 PM +0200 6/23/04, Julian Reschke wrote: >Ted Hardie wrote: > >>Julian, >> I didn't say "dav:" was a URI, I said it was a URI > >I know you didn't say that. I just wanted to point out, that, in >order to be a legal namespace name, "DAV:" would *need* to be a >legal URI. Unfortunately it isn't. That's not my reading of http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114; you seem to believe that a URI reference used as namespace cannot be the bare scheme. The "qualified names" discussion seems to contradict this view, at least in my reading. regards, Ted Hardie
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:37:57 UTC