W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: ID: draft-ietf-webdav-bind-05

From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:37:11 -0700
Message-Id: <p06110406bcff8b569cf0@[]>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Joe Hildebrand <joe@cursive.net>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

At 8:31 PM +0200 6/23/04, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Ted Hardie wrote:
>>     I didn't say "dav:" was a URI, I said it was a URI
>I know you didn't say that. I just wanted to point out, that, in 
>order to be a legal namespace name, "DAV:" would *need* to be a 
>legal URI. Unfortunately it isn't.

That's not my reading of http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114;
you seem to believe that a URI reference used as namespace cannot be the
bare scheme.  The "qualified names" discussion seems to contradict this
view, at least in my reading.

				Ted Hardie
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:37:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:31 UTC