- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:54:56 +0100
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > I agree that some reference to RFC3253 would be useful (e.g. something > like "this provides a detailed description of the binding model that > is implicit in RFC3253"), but I wouldn't say that it "updates" RFC3253, > since it doesn't change anything in RFC3253. Well, "updates" is the only type of link we *can* use (nothing else would create a forward reference in the RFC Index). Besides, I'd say that it in fact "updates" RFC3253, because it updates RFC2518's descriptions for MOVE, COPY, DELETE etc in presence of multiple bindings. Thus, it indeed updates both RFC2518 and RFC3253. Regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 13:55:48 UTC