- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:22:43 -0500
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> > Yah. That's a toughie. It lists things that are both important to the > > binding spec and the base 2518 spec. But it also apparently > > covers things that are outside the realm of each of these specs. > > It might need to be submitted as a seperate document that clarifies > > (and "unifies") both specs after they come out. > > Again strong disagreement. Is it ever not "strong"? :-) > Each of the paragraphs in GULP is needed to correctly explain RFC2518 > locking semantics. If you think there's something which *isn't* needed for > RFC2518, please point to it :-) I step back from what I said. I think it is possible to put the current GULP document in 2518bis. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:25:57 UTC